linux-kernel - Re: TIOCGWINSZ retuns old pty size after receiving SIGWINCH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080819010702.c5300420.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:07:02 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ico Doornekamp <lkml@...v.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TIOCGWINSZ retuns old pty size after receiving SIGWINCH

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:54:14 +0200 Ico Doornekamp <lkml@...v.nl> wrote:

> 
> 
> * On 2008-08-19 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote  :
> 
> > On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:08:59 +0200 Ico Doornekamp <lkml@...v.nl> wrote:
> > 
> > > Recently my X terminals showed annoying behaviour where the application
> > > in the terminal was not resized properly to the actual size of the X
> > > terminal emulator window, resulting in a lot of misaligned text on the
> > > screen. Hunting the issue down from the windowmanager and the terminal
> > > emulator program, I suspect the problem might lie in the kernel. I'm
> > > running 2.6.26 on a dual core i386.
> > > 
> > > What I see is this: the userspace application receives a SIGWINCH signal
> > > and acquires the terminal size usign the TIOCGWINSZ ioctl. It seems that
> > > in some cases the old instead of the new terminal size is returned.
> > > A small delay before the ioctl seems to 'fix' this behaviour.
> > > 
> > > I noticed some changes involving locking in the the pty code in the last
> > > kernel verions, could one of these changes cause the above behaviour ? If
> > > so, wouldn't this affect much more users ?
> > 
> > hm, that code is pretty simple and although it does the SIGWINCH and
> > the window-size setting in a peculiar order, it looks to be race-free.
> > 
> > Approximately what proportion of the time does it go wrong?
> 
> I guess about 10 to 20% of the resizes. I happen to be using a tiling
> window manager which causes resizing more often and more agressive then
> 'normal' window managers, I guess this helps triggering the problem.
> 
> I temporary worked around this issue this by changing the order of the
> signal and the updating of the pty size in tty_io.c's tiocswinsz(), but
> this is not much of a real fix.
> 

Well damn.  Are you sure?  The code looks solid to me.

At least, it does after 

Author: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>  2008-08-15 02:39:38
Committer: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>  2008-08-15 10:34:07
Parent: 000b9151d7851cc1e490b2a76d0206e524f43cca (Fix race/oops in tty layer after BKL pushdown)
Branches: git-cifs, git-ia64, git-nfs, git-powerpc-merge, linux-next, remotes/origin/master
Follows: v2.6.27-rc3
Precedes: next-20080818

    tty: remove resize window special case

perhaps you're still running a kernel which is earlier than that?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/