[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080819101907.GA16446@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:19:07 +0200
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: dirty page tracking race fix
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:11:55AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:38:21 +0200 Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
>
> > There is a race with dirty page accounting where a page may not properly
> > be accounted for.
> >
> > clear_page_dirty_for_io() calls page_mkclean; then TestClearPageDirty.
> >
> > page_mkclean walks the rmaps for that page, and for each one it cleans and
> > write protects the pte if it was dirty. It uses page_check_address to find the
> > pte. That function has a shortcut to avoid the ptl if the pte is not
> > present. Unfortunately, the pte can be switched to not-present then back to
> > present by other code while holding the page table lock -- this should not
> > be a signal for page_mkclean to ignore that pte, because it may be dirty.
> >
> > For example, powerpc64's set_pte_at will clear a previously present pte before
> > setting it to the desired value. There may also be other code in core mm or
> > in arch which do similar things.
> >
> > The consequence of the bug is loss of data integrity due to msync, and loss
> > of dirty page accounting accuracy. XIP's __xip_unmap could easily also be
> > unreliable (depending on the exact XIP locking scheme), which can lead to data
> > corruption.
> >
> > Fix this by having an option to always take ptl to check the pte in
> > page_check_address.
> >
> > It's possible to retain this optimization for page_referenced and
> > try_to_unmap.
>
> Is it also possible to retain it for
>
> /**
> * page_mapped_in_vma - check whether a page is really mapped in a VMA
> * @page: the page to test
> * @vma: the VMA to test
> *
> * Returns 1 if the page is mapped into the page tables of the VMA, 0
> * if the page is not mapped into the page tables of this VMA. Only
> * valid for normal file or anonymous VMAs.
> */
> static int page_mapped_in_vma(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> unsigned long address;
> pte_t *pte;
> spinlock_t *ptl;
>
> address = vma_address(page, vma);
> if (address == -EFAULT) /* out of vma range */
> return 0;
> pte = page_check_address(page, vma->vm_mm, address, &ptl);
> if (!pte) /* the page is not in this mm */
> return 0;
> pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
>
> return 1;
> }
>
> ?
No. While callers of page_mapped_in_vma might be OK with it, the function
comments themselves indicate we can't take the shortcut.
It was possible the retain the optimization for page_referenced and
try_to_unmap because it is OK if those guys fail in rare cases. Page
reclaim will do a final non-racy check of refcounts.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists