[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080819114404.GA5354@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:44:04 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 9] x86/smp function calls: convert x86 tlb flushes
to use function calls [POST 2]
* Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 August 2008 20:20, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> > > I'm especially sore about mmap because I have a customer with a
> > > database that uses a lot of mmap/munmap and those calls have slowed
> > > down something like 50%(!!) from 2.6.early to 2.6.late.
> >
> > oh, agreed that it all needs to speed up - please send testcases ...
>
> I'm not sure if I can send the testcase I have. But this issue is
> coming to the top of my list to investigate in mainline, so I'll check
> out how we're doing here soon.
obviously having a repeatable testcase would jump-start any efforts to
fix this. It doesnt have to be complex - just a .c thing kernel
developers can run and get some quick number out of. A 50% regression
shouldnt be too hard to reproduce even with a vastly simplified
workload.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists