[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48AADF82.6060805@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:58:10 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 9] x86/smp function calls: convert x86 tlb flushes
to use function calls [POST 2]
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> spin_lock_nested() has existed for a long time, but you are now using
> spin_lock_nest_lock(), which is a totally different annotation
>
Yes, typo. The patch itself uses spin_lock_nest_lock().
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists