[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080819175440.GA5435@localhost>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:54:40 +0300
From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: penberg@...helsinki.fi, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, mpm@...enic.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, tzanussi@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Revert "kmemtrace: fix printk format warnings"
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:51:32AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
>
> > This reverts commit 79cf3d5e207243eecb1c4331c569e17700fa08fa.
> >
> > The reverted commit, while it fixed printk format warnings, it resulted in
> > marker-probe format mismatches. Another approach should be used to fix
> > these warnings.
>
> Such as what?
>
> Can marker probes be fixed instead?
>
> After seeing & fixing lots of various warnings in the last few days,
> I'm thinking that people don't look at/heed warnings nowadays. Sad.
> Maybe there are just so many that they are lost in the noise.
Hi,
Check the next patch in the series, it provides the alternate fix.
I favor this approach more because it involves fewer changes and we
don't have to use things like "%zu" (which make data type size less
apparent).
Cheers,
Eduard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists