linux-kernel - Re: [GIT]: Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1219170451.7591.175.camel@violet.holtmann.net>
Date:	Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:27:31 +0200
From:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT]: Networking

Hi Linus,

> For example, those BT updates looked in no way like regression fixes.

the Bluetooth fixes do fix one regression that broke user space
assumptions.

I included additional support for one new driver since I was under the
assumption that new driver support is fine since it can't introduce a
regression. If that has changed then please spell this out and we have
to apply this rule to all subsystems.

Also I cleaned up the MAINTAINERS file entries for Bluetooth. Are these
considered harmful now and should be postponed to the next merge window?
They can obviously not introduce any regressions?

Regards

Marcel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/