[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080819232411.GA5421@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:24:11 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, corentincj@...aif.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] eeepc-laptop: Use standard interfaces
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 08:09:50PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Looks fine to me at first glance. I do wonder if there are no events at all
> you could hook to rfkill_force_state() instead of (or in addition to) using
> the get_state()?
The only change event is generated by hitting the wifi key, which ties
into rfkill-input. Won't that already force a state update on the event?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists