[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48AA4594.1000908@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:31:24 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ryo Tsuruta <ryov@...inux.co.jp>
CC: kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
agk@...rceware.org, xemul@...nvz.org, fernando@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] bio-cgroup: Split the cgroup memory subsystem into
two parts
Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
> Hi Kamezawa-san,
>
>> I'm now writing remove-lock-page-cgroup patches. it works well.
>> please wait for a while...
>
> I'm looking forward to those patches.
>
> By the way, I'm glad if memory-cgroup has a feature which can make a
> page_cgroup move between cgroups with small overhead. It makes
> bio-cgroup improve the accuracy of tracking down pages.
Page movement can be a very expensive operation and is proportional to the size
of the control group. I think movement should be an optional feature, if we ever
add it.
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists