[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48ABF6DC.8070305@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:50:04 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"dri-users@...ts.sourceforge.net" <dri-users@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Subject: Re: AGP and PAT (induced?) problem (on AMD family 6)
On 20-08-08 12:04, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com> wrote:
>
>>> I'd really like a reply from the AGP or PAT side right about now.
>> Hmm. Looks like there are more than 16000 entries in the PAT list!
>
> hm, btw., why is that?
Because 64M of AGP memory divided by 4K pages is 16K. That is, the
underlying problem seems to be AGP drivers using order 0 allocations.
I'm looking.
Do note also that this means that Venki's change would not constitite a
correct/final fix. Sure, caching the last entry speeds up traversing a
16K entry list but the issue is that there shouldn't be a 16K entry
list. Through AGP, or maybe even by coalescing entries in the PAT list
if that's at all possible (I guess it's not really).
Even if such a more fundamental fix isn't (easily) available, the PAT
code already comments that the list, which is sorted by ->start value,
is expected to be short, and should be turned into an rbtree if it isn't
which might be slightly less of a bandaid.
Dave Airlie (as the MAINTAINERS entry) can't be arsed to answer email it
seems so I've added Dave Jones for a possible comment from the AGP side.
If I'm reading this right upto now, still many AGP driver (among which
my amd-k7-agp) are affected.
In the short run and if I'm not just mistaken, the best fix might be to
make PAT dependent on not having a dumb AGP driver (but as said, still
looking).
Note that my chipset is capable of a 2G AGP aperture. That's 512K pages
if fully used, 256K for 1G, 128K for 512M, ...
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists