linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] byteorder: add new headers for make headers-install

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1219252394.6115.1.camel@brick>
Date:	Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:13:14 -0700
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] byteorder: add new headers for make headers-install

On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 15:10 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 13:38 -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Andrew, two fixes before the arches start moving over.
> 
> We don't expose cpu_to_le32() et al., do we? Only __cpu_to_le32() and
> similar? Which exported headers use these -- and are they actually using
> the __ versions? If not, they're not going to work anyway, are they?
> 

Correct, the cpu_to_le32(), etc are wrapped in #ifdef KERNEL, but this adds
the export for the two new headers that will replace the byteorder/*.h
implementation.

Once each arch has moved over, include/linux/byteorder/* will go away.

Cheers,

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/