[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48AC5668.2030203@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:37:44 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, bjorn.helgaas@...com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Kornacker <ckornacker@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introduce interface to report BIOS bugs
Thomas Renninger wrote:
I approve of the basic idea. Some nits in the implementation.
First shouted macros look ugly. Can you use something lower case
similar to dev_printk()?
> +
> +#define FW_EMERG KERN_EMERG /* System cannot boot */
> +#define FW_ALERT KERN_ALERT /* Risk of HW or data damage,
> + e.g. overheating, dmraid */
> +#define FW_CRIT KERN_CRIT /* A major device is not functional
> + e.g. hpet, lapic, network... */
> +#define FW_ERR KERN_ERR /* A major device is not working
> + as expected, e.g. cpufreq stuck
> + to lowest freq, lowered
> + performance, increased power
> + consumption... */
These should probably have another string after the KERN_* severities appended
because KERN_* doesn't make it into the syslog log files or serial
console logs and you would lose the severity then.
> +config REPORT_FIRMWARE_BUGS
> + bool "Report Firmware Bugs"
> + default y
> + help
> + This option will make the kernel print out all firmware bug messages
> + it finds. This especially is very useful on ACPI systems where
> + potentially a lot firmware bugs can happen and should be reported.
> +
> + Always say yes here unless memory really matters.
I don't think this should be a CONFIG. If someone really wants to save
that much memory they can disable printk.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists