linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ftrace: x86 use copy to and from user functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0808201742370.18551@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Aug 2008 17:43:31 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: x86 use copy to and from user functions




On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 12:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > The modification of code is performed either by kstop_machine, before
> > SMP starts, or on module code before the module is executed. There is
> > no reason to do the modifications from assembly. The copy to and from
> > user functions are sufficient and produces cleaner and easier to read
> > code.
> > 
> > Thanks to Benjamin Herrenschmidt for suggesting the idea.
> 
> Haven't we lost the dcache/icache synchronisation somewhere ?

This is the x86 version, sync_core should be fine.

-- Steve

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c |   38 +++++++++++++-------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Index: linux-tip.git/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-tip.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c	2008-08-20 12:39:41.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-tip.git/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c	2008-08-20 12:40:17.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >  
> >  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> >  #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> > +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> >  #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> >  #include <linux/percpu.h>
> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> > @@ -60,11 +61,7 @@ notrace int
> >  ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, unsigned char *old_code,
> >  		   unsigned char *new_code)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned replaced;
> > -	unsigned old = *(unsigned *)old_code; /* 4 bytes */
> > -	unsigned new = *(unsigned *)new_code; /* 4 bytes */
> > -	unsigned char newch = new_code[4];
> > -	int faulted = 0;
> > +	unsigned char replaced[MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE];
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Note: Due to modules and __init, code can
> > @@ -72,29 +69,20 @@ ftrace_modify_code(unsigned long ip, uns
> >  	 *  as well as code changing.
> >  	 *
> >  	 * No real locking needed, this code is run through
> > -	 * kstop_machine.
> > +	 * kstop_machine, or before SMP starts.
> >  	 */
> > -	asm volatile (
> > -		"1: lock\n"
> > -		"   cmpxchg %3, (%2)\n"
> > -		"   jnz 2f\n"
> > -		"   movb %b4, 4(%2)\n"
> > -		"2:\n"
> > -		".section .fixup, \"ax\"\n"
> > -		"3:	movl $1, %0\n"
> > -		"	jmp 2b\n"
> > -		".previous\n"
> > -		_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 3b)
> > -		: "=r"(faulted), "=a"(replaced)
> > -		: "r"(ip), "r"(new), "c"(newch),
> > -		  "0"(faulted), "a"(old)
> > -		: "memory");
> > -	sync_core();
> > +	if (__copy_from_user(replaced, (char __user *)ip, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE))
> > +		return 1;
> >  
> > -	if (replaced != old && replaced != new)
> > -		faulted = 2;
> > +	if (memcmp(replaced, old_code, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE) != 0)
> > +		return 2;
> >  
> > -	return faulted;
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(__copy_to_user((char __user *)ip, new_code,
> > +				    MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE));
> > +
> > +	sync_core();
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  notrace int ftrace_update_ftrace_func(ftrace_func_t func)
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/