[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080820001845.GC28029@jukie.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:18:45 -0400
From: Bart Trojanowski <bart@...ie.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: vfat BKL/lock_super regression in v2.6.26-rc3-g8f59342
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> [080819 18:19]:
> And I think you hit this issue because you probably mounted the USB stick
> as a "sync" (or dirsync) mount - which is what some distros do by default,
> even if it is known to cause problems for some flash cards that don't do a
> good job at wear levelling.
Hmm... I was considering the costs and benefits of sync mounts. I don't
care about the performance hit, as I don't move that much data around.
Primarily, I like the fact that I can pull the media out w/o any special
action (which sometimes requires that I unlock my screensaver first).
But, on the other hand, it's nice to have the media last longer.
So, maybe it would be a good idea to have a 'delaysync=60' to force a
sync after 60 seconds of inactivity. Unless, there is something else
that would do that for me already.
Thoughts?
-Bart
--
WebSig: http://www.jukie.net/~bart/sig/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists