lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <48AD3569.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:29:13 +0100
From:	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	<xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3 of 4] xen: allow interrupts to be enabled while
	doing ablocking spin

Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>

>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> 21.08.08 02:02 >>>
If spin_lock is called in an interrupts-enabled context, we can safely
enable interrupts while spinning.  We don't bother for the actual spin
loop, but if we timeout and fall back to blocking, it's definitely
worthwhile enabling interrupts if possible.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
---
 arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c |   30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
--- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 	u32 taken_slow_nested;
 	u32 taken_slow_pickup;
 	u32 taken_slow_spurious;
+	u32 taken_slow_irqenable;
 
 	u64 released;
 	u32 released_slow;
@@ -167,12 +168,13 @@
 	__get_cpu_var(lock_spinners) = prev;
 }
 
-static noinline int xen_spin_lock_slow(struct raw_spinlock *lock)
+static noinline int xen_spin_lock_slow(struct raw_spinlock *lock, bool irq_enable)
 {
 	struct xen_spinlock *xl = (struct xen_spinlock *)lock;
 	struct xen_spinlock *prev;
 	int irq = __get_cpu_var(lock_kicker_irq);
 	int ret;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	/* If kicker interrupts not initialized yet, just spin */
 	if (irq == -1)
@@ -180,6 +182,12 @@
 
 	/* announce we're spinning */
 	prev = spinning_lock(xl);
+
+	flags = __raw_local_save_flags();
+	if (irq_enable) {
+		ADD_STATS(taken_slow_irqenable, 1);
+		raw_local_irq_enable();
+	}
 
 	ADD_STATS(taken_slow, 1);
 	ADD_STATS(taken_slow_nested, prev != NULL);
@@ -220,11 +228,12 @@
 	kstat_irqs_this_cpu(irq_to_desc(irq))++;
 
 out:
+	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
 	unspinning_lock(xl, prev);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void xen_spin_lock(struct raw_spinlock *lock)
+static inline void __xen_spin_lock(struct raw_spinlock *lock, bool irq_enable)
 {
 	struct xen_spinlock *xl = (struct xen_spinlock *)lock;
 	unsigned timeout;
@@ -254,9 +263,21 @@
 		    : "memory");
 
 		spin_time_accum_fast(start_spin_fast);
-	} while (unlikely(oldval != 0 && (TIMEOUT == ~0 || !xen_spin_lock_slow(lock))));
+
+	} while (unlikely(oldval != 0 &&
+			  (TIMEOUT == ~0 || !xen_spin_lock_slow(lock, irq_enable))));
 
 	spin_time_accum(start_spin);
+}
+
+static void xen_spin_lock(struct raw_spinlock *lock)
+{
+	__xen_spin_lock(lock, false);
+}
+
+static void xen_spin_lock_flags(struct raw_spinlock *lock, unsigned long flags)
+{
+	__xen_spin_lock(lock, !raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags));
 }
 
 static noinline void xen_spin_unlock_slow(struct xen_spinlock *xl)
@@ -323,6 +344,7 @@
 	pv_lock_ops.spin_is_locked = xen_spin_is_locked;
 	pv_lock_ops.spin_is_contended = xen_spin_is_contended;
 	pv_lock_ops.spin_lock = xen_spin_lock;
+	pv_lock_ops.spin_lock_flags = xen_spin_lock_flags;
 	pv_lock_ops.spin_trylock = xen_spin_trylock;
 	pv_lock_ops.spin_unlock = xen_spin_unlock;
 }
@@ -353,6 +375,8 @@
 			   &spinlock_stats.taken_slow_pickup);
 	debugfs_create_u32("taken_slow_spurious", 0444, d_spin_debug,
 			   &spinlock_stats.taken_slow_spurious);
+	debugfs_create_u32("taken_slow_irqenable", 0444, d_spin_debug,
+			   &spinlock_stats.taken_slow_irqenable);
 
 	debugfs_create_u64("released", 0444, d_spin_debug, &spinlock_stats.released);
 	debugfs_create_u32("released_slow", 0444, d_spin_debug,



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ