[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0808210031r372c12bau7c94d86f2c9120d4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:31:31 +0900
From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cl@...ux-foundation.org,
tokunaga.keiich@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs
>> IA64 seems to be one of the few platforms to define this as a macro
>> evaluating to the node-to-cpumask array entry, so it's clear what
>> platform Motohiro-san did build testing on :-)
>
> Seems to compile OK on x86_32, x86_64, ia64 and powerpc for some reason.
>
> This seems to fix things on sparc64:
>
> --- a/mm/quicklist.c~mm-quicklist-shouldnt-be-proportional-to-number-of-cpus-fix
> +++ a/mm/quicklist.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static unsigned long max_pages(unsigned
> unsigned long node_free_pages, max;
> int node = numa_node_id();
> struct zone *zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones;
> - int num_cpus_per_node;
> + cpumask_t node_cpumask;
>
> node_free_pages =
> #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ static unsigned long max_pages(unsigned
>
> max = node_free_pages / FRACTION_OF_NODE_MEM;
>
> - num_cpus_per_node = cpus_weight_nr(node_to_cpumask(node));
> - max /= num_cpus_per_node;
> + node_cpumask = node_to_cpumask(node);
> + max /= cpus_weight_nr(node_cpumask);
>
> return max(max, min_pages);
> }
Thank you!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists