[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080821114040.GA30667@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:40:40 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
vatsa <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: properly account IRQ and RT load in SCHED_OTHER
load balancing
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 13:17 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> >
> > > > This patch tries to solve this issue by accounting the time spend on
> > > > both Real-Time tasks and IRQ handling, and using that to
> > > > proportionally inflate the SCHED_OTHER load.
> > >
> > > applied it to tip/sched/devel for more testing.
> >
> > -tip testing found that it wouldnt build on UP in sched_debug.c - made
> > that bit dependent on CONFIG_SMP. sched_scale_load() does not seem to be
> > too meaningful on UP.
>
> Thanks - just prior to posting I removed the empty stub for
> sched_scale_load() because it didn't make sense for UP code to use
> it...
>
> So much for double checking myself.
hm, the empty stub might be useful still and would remove the #ifdef
from sched_debug.c. Could you please send a delta patch against
tip/master?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists