linux-kernel - Re: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1219285502.8781.35.camel@ymzhang>
Date:	Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:25:02 +0800
From:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Aneesh Kumar KV <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
Subject: Re: VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1


On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 15:47 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> 
> > Just realized my brainfart..
> > 
> > ---
> > Subject: sched: load-balance bias fixes
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Date: Wed Aug 20 15:28:51 CEST 2008
> > 
> > Yanmin spotted a regression with my patch that introduces LB_BIAS:
> 
> ok, i've applied this one to tip/sched/urgent instead of the 
> feature-disabling patchlet. Yanmin, could you please check whether this 
> one does the trick?
This new patch almost doesn't help volanoMark. Pls. use the patch
which sets LB_BIAS=1 by default.

-yanmin


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/