[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080821121748.GA3384@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:17:48 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debug: fix BUILD_BUG_ON() for non-constant expressions
* Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
> >
> >> If the user of virtio_has_feature() must pass a compile-time constant
> >> then it must be converted to a MACRO, and then the BUILD_BUG_ON will
> >> work. Or it should be changed to a BUG_ON() if fbit is a runtime
> >> variable.
> >
>
> The use of __builtin_constant_p in inline functions is broken. This is
> because it will give different results depending on the -O level used.
> So I think that using it in the Kernel with inlines is plain broken.
> And should be discouraged.
ok - that's convincing, so your approach is superior to my hack on
multiple levels.
Could you please (re-)send your patch(es) with a changelog, etc., so
that i can apply it and drop my patches?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists