| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <18605.27256.481932.278108@harpo.it.uu.se> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:15:36 +0200 From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se> To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org> Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc3: 'APIC error on CPU1: 00(40)', but only on resume! Maciej W. Rozycki writes: > On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote: > > > Ah, right. Here is a dump of the LVT registers: > > > > [00000320] = 000100ef > > [00000330] = 00000200 > > [00000340] = 00010000 > > [00000350] = 00010700 > > [00000360] = 00000400 > > [00000370] = 000000fe > > > > Maybe I've misunderstood something (again), but should those vectors > > really be 0 for 330-360? (At least 330 + 360, which are not masked.) > > Masked entries should be fine long-term, although I have a vague > recollection at least some implementations do send a vector error when an > LVT register is written with a masked entry implying an invalid vector, > e.g. a value like 0x00010000. The original Intel P6s do that. Dunno about the post-P4 ones. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists