[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080821154259.a57d8bb6.glisse@freedesktop.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:42:59 +0200
From: Jerome Glisse <glisse@...edesktop.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export shmem_file_setup and shmem_getpage for DRM-GEM
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:50:11 -0700
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> wrote:
> As for in-kernel stuff, as long as we keep the GEM shmem hooks separate from
> the actual bookkeeping (like we do now with i915_gem_create_ioctl() vs
> drm_gem_object_alloc() for example) we should be able to do the in-kernel
> stuff w/o jumping through too many VFS/VM hoops. That would also assume we
> don't care about swapping in the in-kernel case, which we don't; we want to
> pin the kernel allocated frame buffer and other memory anyway, so using the
> internal functions should be fine.
What about suspend to disk ? How do we save such buffers ?
Btw i think that GTT looks a lot like IOMMU, i don't know the IOMMU kernel
side API that much, but from memory i think that you have call to ask IOMMU
mapping why not do somethings like that for GTT ?
You get normal mapping of object diret but userspace can ask some kind of
GTT mapping on a given object. Anyway new flag on fd sounds good enough too.
Cheers,
Jerome Glisse <glisse@...edesktop.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists