[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0808212031050.4532@dhcppc2>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:33:50 +0300 (MET DST)
From: Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...s-3g.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS vs Elevators (was Re: [PATCH RFC] nilfs2: continuous
snapshotting file system)
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 04:04:18PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > >
> > > One thing I just found out - my old *laptop* is 4-5x faster than the
> > > 10krpm scsi disk behind an old cciss raid controller. I'm wondering
> > > if the long delays in dispatch is caused by an interaction with CTQ
> > > but I can't change it on the cciss raid controllers. Are you using
> > > ctq/ncq on your machine?
>
> It's a laptop and has NCQ. It makes no difference if NCQ is enabled or
> disabled. The problem seems to be XFS only.
The 'nobarrier' mount option made a big improvement:
MB/s Runtime (s)
----- -----------
btrfs unstable 17.09 572
ext3 13.24 877
btrfs 0.16 12.33 793
nilfs2 2nd+ runs 11.29 674
ntfs-3g 8.55 865
reiserfs 8.38 966
xfs nobarrier 7.89 949
nilfs2 1st run 4.95 3800
xfs 1.88 3901
Szaka
--
NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists