[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080820.200852.193706487.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: holt@....com
Cc: cl@...ux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tokunaga.keiich@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic.
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:13:32 -0500
> One problem I see is somebody got rid of the node awareness. We used
> to not put pages onto a quicklist when they were being released from a
> different node than the cpu is on. Not sure where that went. It was
> done because of the trap page problem described here.
NUMA awareness is one of the reasons I keep thinking about dropping
quicklist usage on sparc64.
Using SLAB/SLUB for the page table bits with appropriate constructor
and destructor bits ought to be able to approximate the gains
from avoiding the initialization for cached objects.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists