[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080821202504.GU8318@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:25:04 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: refcount leak in pci_get_device()?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 02:19:18PM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
> #define for_each_pci_dev(d) while ((d = pci_get_device(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, d)) != NULL)
>
> That eventually calls pci_get_dev_by_id(), which increases the
> refcount on the device, but never decrements it.
>
> Looks like that change in behavior happened here:
>
> PCI: clean up search.c a lot
> 95247b57ed844511a212265b45cf9a919753aea1
>
> pci_get_device() used to decrement the refcount, but no longer
> does.
>
> Thanks to Matthew Wilcox for helping me get this far...
>
> Like I said, I'm still trying to track down my particular issue,
> but I'd like to get your opinion on this.
In particular, I'd like to know whether this should be fixed by
pci_get_dev_by_id() decrementing the refcount of from/dev_start,
pci_get_subsys() decrementing 'from', or by bus_find_device()
decrementing 'start'. It looks like bus_find_device() is the place
where this should logically happen, but the kerneldoc doesn't document
the intended behaviour.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists