[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874p5eqa6h.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:23:50 +0900
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
"MASON\,CHRISTOPHER" <CHRIS.MASON@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: Mount ext3 with barrier=1 doesn't send real barrier bio?
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net> writes:
>> --- a/fs/buffer.c
>> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
>> @@ -2926,16 +2926,16 @@ int submit_bh(int rw, struct buffer_head * bh)
>> BUG_ON(!buffer_mapped(bh));
>> BUG_ON(!bh->b_end_io);
>>
>> - if (buffer_ordered(bh) && (rw == WRITE))
>> - rw = WRITE_BARRIER;
>> -
>> /*
>> * Only clear out a write error when rewriting, should this
>> * include WRITE_SYNC as well?
>> */
>> - if (test_set_buffer_req(bh) && (rw == WRITE || rw == WRITE_BARRIER))
>> + if (test_set_buffer_req(bh) && rw == WRITE)
>> clear_buffer_write_io_error(bh);
This should be ((rw & RW_MASK) == WRITE) too? Anyway, this seems change
behavior of submit_bh(WRITE_BARRIER) (maybe reiserfs only), it wouldn't
be your intent...
>> + if (buffer_ordered(bh) && ((rw & RW_MASK) == WRITE))
>> + rw |= (1 << BIO_RW_BARRIER);
>> +
>> /*
>> * from here on down, it's all bio -- do the initial mapping,
>> * submit_bio -> generic_make_request may further map this bio around
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists