[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48ADFFD2.7030309@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:52:50 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix probe_nr_irqs for xen
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>>> otherwise Xen is _completely_ unusable with 5 or more VCPUs.
>>> ( when !CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ)
>>>
>>> based on Alex's patch
>>>
>>> also add +1 offset after redir_entries
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
>>> Cc: Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@...rix.com>
>>>
>>>
>> Looks good to me. We can fix this in a better way later.
>>
>
> later could set CONFIG_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ to true by default.
>
Well, perhaps. But we can use vectors rather than IRQs for Xen event
channel mappings, which will save us from having to allocate lots of
per-cpu irqs.
Also, implementing probe_nr_irqs() in a more generic (rather than
io_apic-specific) way. Using some interface that queries each irq chip
for how many irqs it supports, or something.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists