[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080822101910.GH6542@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:19:10 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
len.brown@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, bjorn.helgaas@...com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Kornacker <ckornacker@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introduce interface to report BIOS bugs
Hi!
>
> This is mostly needed for ACPI systems.
> ACPI introduces an endless amount of possible BIOS
> bugs like wrong values, missing functions, etc.
> The kernel has to sanity check all of them and should
> report BIOS bugs as such to the user.
>
> ACPI is the main target, of course others, who already declare BIOS bugs,
> also benefit from this, e.g. PCI:
> arch/x86/pci/pcbios.c:
> printk(KERN_WARNING "bios32_service(0x%lx): returned 0x%x -- BIOS bug!\n",
> printk (KERN_ERR "PCI: BIOS BUG #%x[%08x] found\n",
> ...
> This one I stumbled over recently (when >4GB BIOS sets up IO mem for this
> device wrongly on some Dell notebooks):
> ohci_hcd 0000:00:02.0: USB HC takeover failed! (BIOS/SMM bug)
I like the idea... Plus, it would be cool to have message clearly
state if Linux could work around this problem.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists