[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080822134636.5797.34406.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:46:36 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: jmorris@...ei.org, a.beregalov@...il.com
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] CRED: Further fix execve cred_exec_mutex handling [ver #2]
Further fix the way cred_exec_mutex is handled by [compat_]do_execve(). The
mutex is now only unlocked by the function that locked it, and is no longer
unlocked by free_bprm() or install_exec_creds(). This means that PTRACE_ATTACH
may have to wait a little longer before being allowed to proceed.
This patch cleans up the order in which the mutex is locked and unlocked and
gets rid of a potential double unlock.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
fs/compat.c | 14 ++++++++------
fs/exec.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/compat.c b/fs/compat.c
index af24b8a..0c400ad 100644
--- a/fs/compat.c
+++ b/fs/compat.c
@@ -1411,12 +1411,14 @@ int compat_do_execve(char * filename,
goto out;
retval = search_binary_handler(bprm, regs);
- if (retval >= 0) {
- /* execve success */
- acct_update_integrals(current);
- free_bprm(bprm);
- return retval;
- }
+ if (retval < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ /* execve succeeded */
+ mutex_unlock(¤t->cred_exec_mutex);
+ acct_update_integrals(current);
+ free_bprm(bprm);
+ return retval;
out:
if (bprm->mm)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 4b31a72..a03a435 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1047,11 +1047,12 @@ void install_exec_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
security_bprm_committing_creds(bprm);
- /* we hold cred_exec_mutex this far to prevent ptrace_attach() from
- * altering our determination of the task's credentials */
commit_creds(bprm->cred);
bprm->cred = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(¤t->cred_exec_mutex);
+
+ /* cred_exec_mutex must be held at least to this point to prevent
+ * ptrace_attach() from altering our determination of the task's
+ * credentials; any time after this it may be unlocked */
security_bprm_committed_creds(bprm);
}
@@ -1277,10 +1278,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(search_binary_handler);
void free_bprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
free_arg_pages(bprm);
- if (bprm->cred) {
- mutex_unlock(¤t->cred_exec_mutex);
+ if (bprm->cred)
abort_creds(bprm->cred);
- }
kfree(bprm);
}
@@ -1358,14 +1357,16 @@ int do_execve(char * filename,
current->flags &= ~PF_KTHREAD;
retval = search_binary_handler(bprm,regs);
- if (retval >= 0) {
- /* execve success */
- acct_update_integrals(current);
- free_bprm(bprm);
- if (displaced)
- put_files_struct(displaced);
- return retval;
- }
+ if (retval < 0)
+ goto out;
+
+ /* execve succeeded */
+ mutex_unlock(¤t->cred_exec_mutex);
+ acct_update_integrals(current);
+ free_bprm(bprm);
+ if (displaced)
+ put_files_struct(displaced);
+ return retval;
out:
if (bprm->mm)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists