[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200808221852.38950.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:52:37 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Jared Hulbert" <jaredeh@...il.com>
Cc: "Phillip Lougher" <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Jörn Engel" <joern@...fs.org>,
tim.bird@...sony.com, cotte@...ibm.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] AXFS: axfs_super.c
On Friday 22 August 2008, Jared Hulbert wrote:
> > This implies for block devices that the entire filesystem metadata has to be
> > cached in RAM. This severely limits the size of AXFS filesystems when using
> > block devices, or the else memory usage will be excessive.
>
> This is where 64bit squashfs could be a better fit.
Is this the only place where squashfs has a significant advantage?
If so, you might want to change it in axfs eventually to make the
decision easier for users ;-)
It certainly sounds like something for your medium-term TODO list,
although I wouldn't think of it as a show-stopper.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists