[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080822130235.af69ccb5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:02:35 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: ehabkost@...hat.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] add phys_addr_t for holding physical addresses
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:02:50 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Add a kernel-wide "phys_addr_t" which is guaranteed to be able to hold
> any physical address. By default it equals the word size of the
> architecture, but a 32-bit architecture can set ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
> if it needs a 64-bit phys_addr_t.
>
You say this is a bugfix but you don't describe the bug. This makes it
rather hard to make the 2.6.2[5678] decisions.
Ditto on [patch 2/3].
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists