[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1219435885.20559.125.camel@nimitz>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:11:25 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>
Cc: containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jeremy@...p.org,
arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2][PATCH 1/9] Create trivial sys_checkpoint/sys_restart
syscalls
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 12:32 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 23:03 -0400, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > 6/unistd_32.h
> > index d739467..88bdec4 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-x86/unistd_32.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-x86/unistd_32.h
> > @@ -338,6 +338,8 @@
> > #define __NR_dup3 330
> > #define __NR_pipe2 331
> > #define __NR_inotify_init1 332
> > +#define __NR_checkpoint 333
> > +#define __NR_restart 334
> >
> > #ifdef __KERNEL__
>
> Uh oh. These got whitespace mangled somehow. I'll look through them,
> but probably can't produce patches on top of them for now.
This patch also has to go *AFTER* you actually define the syscall
functions. Otherwise, this won't be build-bisectable when it gets
committed.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists