[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0808221632410.14231@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:33:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
cc: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: ftraced and suspend to ram
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Does ftrace hook itself onto _all_ the functions? Or all .c functions?
It hooks into all .c functions that are not annotated with "notrace"
or the files have not been marked in the Makefile like:
CFLAGS_REMOVE_<file>.o = -pg
>
> I guess low-level suspend code needs to be exempt from
> tracing. Certainly all the assembly functions.
I'm looking into that now too. Are the functions in arch/x86/power/cpu*.c
the suspend to ram code?
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists