[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.1.10.0808230932440.26410@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:33:20 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
tpm@...horst.net, tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] securityfs: do not depend on CONFIG_SECURITY
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Eric Paris wrote:
> Add a new Kconfig option SECURITYFS which will build securityfs support
> but does not require CONFIG_SECURITY. The only current user of
> securityfs does not depend on CONFIG_SECURITY and there is no reason the
> full LSM needs to be built to build this fs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
>
Reviewed-by: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists