[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080822051656.GA7696@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:16:56 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@...rix.com>,
Alan Mayer <ajm@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix probe_nr_irqs for xen
* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> > But by all means SPARSEIRQ is the primary and only model on x86.
> >
> > We could even plug in the dynamic vector allocator from Alan Mayer
> > now, both on 32-bit and on 64-bit x86: Yinghai, any complications
> > expected there? I guess we need to unify the local APIC code first.
>
> apic_32.c and apic_64.c
> irqinit_32.c and irqinit_64.c
> irq_32.c and irq_64.c
>
> Cyrill, is still working on merging apic_32.c apic_64.c.?
there's a few weeks of inactivity expected in that area i think - so if
you'd like to pick it up from there, feel free ...
but apic_32/64.c is looking already pretty good in tip/master:
1 file changed, 391 insertions(+), 358 deletions(-)
the most significant bit of that delta seems to be around x2apic,
calibration differences and some older 32-bit legacies which are not on
the 64-bit side (but which we can add safely).
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists