linux-kernel - Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86802c440808231351w491dc6acjec0590eb5f8d09fb@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:51:37 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"David Witbrodt" <dawitbro@...global.net>
Cc:	"Rufus & Azrael" <rufus-azrael@...ericable.fr>,
	"Linux-kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kenrel@...il.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression

On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:47 PM, David Witbrodt <dawitbro@...global.net> wrote:
>
>
>> please check v2.
>
> Thanks Yinghai.  This still applies to a different line number in
> v2.6.27-rc4 than what the patch indicates.  I also get a warning
> about unused variable "i" (I commented it out in my previous fix,
> but not this time).
>
> At any rate, I still produces a kernel that hangs at the typical
> location.
>
David,

please check v3

deviceid should be 0x4385 instead.

YH

View attachment "hpet_in_bar1_v3.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1352 bytes)