[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080823104311.GC25904@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:43:11 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@...litt.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 11388] New: 2.6.27-rc3 warns about MTRR range; only 3 of
16gb of memory is usable
* Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@...litt.com> wrote:
> > I've confirmed that the boards in these systems are Tyan Tempest
> > i5400PW (S5397)s. We've discovered a workload that will deadlock
> > the system under both 2.6.24.2 and -tip kernel with the mtrr masking
> > patch. The only thing unusual about this workload is that one of
> > the binaries in it constantly segvs... Is it possible that these
> > deadlocks (no kernel oops on console) are caused by MSR setup
> > wierdness or is it likely unrelated?
>
> could be other problem.
>
> cpu should be smarter enough to understand the missing bits in mask.
> at least amd cpu. remember that we didn't set mask bits to 40bits with
> opteron with LinuxBIOS, and everything still works well.
yeah. Is the deadlock debuggable? (does nmi_watchdog=1 produce anything
useful, or does the enabling of CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y show anything
weird in the syslog during light, non-deadlocking use of this workload?)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists