[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808241152370.3363@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc4-git1: Reported regressions from 2.6.26
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>
> I haven't really used the hlists before, so my first instinct was to
> do what is obvious.
I do agree that the hlist versions aren't very nice in this regard. The
regular lists are much better at moving lists around.
> Other than that, I guess open-coding list ops is also not very good
> programming practice? :-)
Agreed. It would be better if the people who use hlists most (I think that
would be networking) would think about this.
> But... feel free to submit your own patch. Oh, what am I saying.
Silly boy. Next you'll ask me to _test_ any patches I send out.
Anyway, I think your patch is likely fine, I just thought it looked a bit
odd to have a loop to move a list from one head pointer to another.
But regardless, it would need some testing. Daniel?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists