| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:57:44 +0100 (IST) From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [git pull] drm patches for 2.6.27 final > Quite frankly, I'm not going to take this. > > None of what you describe sounds like regressions, and this is just TOO > F*CKING LATE to take big changes like this, to a fragile subsystem that > has historically easily introduced new regressions. > > Can you please make a branch with ONLY REGRESSIONS, or fixes for major > problems that don't introduce several thousand lines of new code? > > Because you seem to be constantly unable to understand what "merge window" > means. And I'm not going to take this kind of crap. I thought you might say that, I'll re-send with just the ones that fix the major issues, instead of ones that fix issues people wanted fixed. Most of the real bits were in Rawhide kernels for a few weeks, which tbh kicks the ass outta a linux-next/linux-mm test cycle. Your reply now serves as place to point people at when they ask why Red Hat/Fedora ships features that they can't get for 1-6 months, and I'm fine with that. Dave. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists