[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558013.68193.qm@web82107.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Witbrodt <dawitbro@...global.net>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression
> > (BTW, just what kernel version were you using for those patches? The
> > v2.6.27-rcX series place the patch's changes over 100 lines earlier
> > than the line numbers indicated in your patches....)
>
> we are working on tip/master
My mistake... sorry. Previously, Ingo had me doing things with tip/master,
but usually you had me working with v2.6.27-rc3. I should have tried
tip/master as soon as I saw the discrepancy.
I have some questions about what happens next:
- This fix will naturally make it into v2.6.27, maybe even as soon
as v2.6.27-rc5, correct?
- Is there any chance I can get it into the stable 2.6.26.X updates?
(Who should I ask, or are only developers allowed to lobby for this
sort of thing?)
- Are you worried about the potential problems of a quirk-based approach?
What if many more people experience a similar regression once 2.6.26 or
later appears in their distribution? I'm sure you don't want to have to
write a different quirk for each individual's hardware, and this problem
did not arise with the approach used for resource management in 2.6.25.
Thanks again Yinghai (and Ingo),
Dave W.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists