[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1219660496.8515.22.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:34:56 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Josh Triplett <josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cl@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
manfred@...orfullife.com, dipankar@...ibm.com, schamp@....com,
niv@...ibm.com, dvhltc@...ibm.com, ego@...ibm.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC, tip/core/rcu] scalable classic RCU implementation
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 16:29 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > @@ -26,8 +27,10 @@
> > * http://lse.sourceforge.net/locking/rclock_OLS.2001.05.01c.sc.pdf (OLS2001)
> > *
> > * For detailed explanation of Read-Copy Update mechanism see -
> > - * Documentation/RCU
> > - *
> > + * Documentation/RCU
> > + * http://lwn.net/Articles/262464/ (What is RCU, Fundamentally?)
> > + * http://lwn.net/Articles/263130/ (What is RCU's Usage?)
> > + * http://lwn.net/Articles/264090/ (What is RCU's API? + references)
> > */
>
> Why put these references here rather than in Documentation/RCU? It
> seems easier to keep documentation up to date in one place. If you
> think these represent a good "getting started" set of documents, how
> about a Documentation/RCU/ReadTheseFirst with links to them, or how
> about linking to them from whatisRCU.txt?
I actually like in code comments and 'documentation' more than
Documentation/ stuff. Mostly because Documentation/ is:
- far away from the code
- therefore, more easily bitrotted
- and easily forgotten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists