linux-kernel - Re: Visible Ctrl-C in latest kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080825141354.GB19337@1wt.eu>
Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:13:54 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Joe Peterson <joe@...rush.com>
Cc:	Chris Frey <cdfrey@...rsquare.net>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Visible Ctrl-C in latest kernels

Hi Joe,

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 08:00:07AM -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
> Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >>> Chris, yes, what you are now seeing on the newer kernel is correct.
> >> Thanks guys.  I was not aware of this change before asking.  The change
> >> makes sense.  I wasn't having any problems with it, just wondering where
> >> it came from.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the enlightenment. :-)
> > 
> > I would not be surprized that it is what has caused delays for Ctrl-C
> > to take effect for some of us. As discussed in another thread on the
> > subject, the problem was relatively recent and not easy to reproduce.
> > Now we have a patch to try to revert if/when we finally get a reproducible
> > case.
> 
> It seems very unlikely that the echo has anything to do with it, other
> than making the problem more visible.  See this post:
> 
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121526224222656&w=2

possible, indeed.

> And to what patch of yours are you referring?

not mine, I was speaking about your patch of 2008/02/06 which was
talked about earlier in this thread. I was thinking that it was
possible that the signal got delayed when it was hard to print
^C because the output was already busy spewing a stream of data.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I mean it does not cost much to try to revert
this patch when the problem is encountered. And I keep in mind
that it is possible, as you say, that your patch only makes the
problem more visible.

Regards,
Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/