linux-kernel - Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86802c440808251028p31edcbeaofa9bbb344e64ba3a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:28:13 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"David Witbrodt" <dawitbro@...global.net>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Linux-kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- found another user with the same regression

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:39 AM, David Witbrodt <dawitbro@...global.net> wrote:
>
>
>> this one should work. please apply this one only.
>
> Oops.  Didn't read all my emails first... went through inbox
> one-at-a-time.  (When will I ever learn?...  ;)
>
>
> Results for:  check_res_with_bar_v2.patch
>
> Kernel boots fine.  Massive debugging output follows:
>
> PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
> pci 0000:00:14.0: BAR has HPET at fed00000-fed003ff
> initcall pci_subsys_init+0x0/0x120 returned 0 after 0 msecs

so that works...

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/