linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH, v2] PCI: create function symlinks in /sys/bus/pci/slots/N/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:07:13 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] PCI: create function symlinks in
	/sys/bus/pci/slots/N/

On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 02:04:46PM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
> * Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 01:53:58PM -0600, Alex Chiang wrote:
> > > 
> > > Does anyone have numbers for how much it costs to create a new
> > > symlink? I could try and figure this out but it will take a few
> > > days (busy with other stuff).
> > 
> > Almost nothing.
> > 
> > sysfs creates these things on the fly as they are accessed, and if
> > memory pressure on the machine happens, they are freed up properly and
> > then created again if a user asks to see them in the tree.
> > 
> > So don't worry about memory issues when adding new files or symlinks in
> > sysfs, it just isn't a problem (we handle 20000 disks easily on low
> > memory 31bit s390 systems.)
> 
> Great, thanks for the explanation.  I've heard the "memory
> overhead" argument before for not wanting to create other sysfs
> files/links, so this will be good to debunk that bogeyman if it
> pops up again in the future.

Yes, please do.

> Did you get a chance to take a look at the documentation I wrote
> for these new symlinks? [I also went and documented the existing
> slots/ directory as well...]
> 
> Was it what you had in mind?

Yes, it looked very good.

And thanks for the other documentation as well, if you want, you could
split that out as a different patch and odds are Jesse could get that
into the tree before 2.6.27 comes out :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/