[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0808261406330.28361@cliff.in.clinika.pl>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:24:20 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: default to reboot via ACPI
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Most machines are recent machines.
This is a bold statement I would say. Any numbers to back it up?
> If a machine doesn't have acpi, this change is safe.
>
> If a machine has acpi, but doesn't have the reset register set in the
> FADT, this change is safe.
>
> If a machine has acpi, and the reset register is set incorrectly, this
> change is safe.
>
> If a machine has acpi, and the reset register is wired to the launch
> controller, then perhaps this change is unsafe. Don't issue sysrq-b on
> such machines.
If a machine has ACPI and it is broken randomly, then the results can be
arbitrary. Hopefully not destructively. If even such a simple thing as
wiring the reset line so that it functions correctly can be got wrong,
more so can be more complex matters.
Failing a better alternative, I suppose the change has to go in though.
Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists