[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48B48B11.8050000@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:00:33 -0700
From: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@...co.com>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c - bisected
Parag Warudkar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>> And embedded people (the ones that might care about 1% code size) are the
>> ones that would also want smaller stacks even more!
>
> This is something I never understood - embedded devices are not going
> to run more than a few processes and 4K*(Few Processes)
> IMHO is not worth a saving now a days even in embedded world given
> falling memory prices. Or do I misunderstand?
Embedded applications span a huge range of sizes, from the very small devices to
which you refer, to quite complex devices. The cable settop boxes we develop have
over a hundred interrupt sources, typically run 250-300 threads, and have 192+
MiB of memory. For all that, we are very cost sensitive and are under constant
pressure to come up with reliable ways to save memory.
> Parag
--
David VomLehn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists