[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0808261644260.3363@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>
cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c -
bisected
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Parag Warudkar wrote:
>
> This is something I never understood - embedded devices are not going
> to run more than a few processes and 4K*(Few Processes)
> IMHO is not worth a saving now a days even in embedded world given
> falling memory prices. Or do I misunderstand?
Well, by that argument, 1% of kernel size doesn't matter either..
1% of a kernel for an embedded device is roughly 10-30kB or so depending
on how small you make the configuration.
If that matters, then so should the difference of 3-8 processes' kernel
stack usage when you have a 4k/8k stack choice.
And they _all_ will have at least 3-8 processes on them. Even the simplest
ones will tend to have many more.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists