linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <86802c440808260136t3a33a9c8if53b6f70ab9df9e2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:36:05 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Alan.Brunelle@...com,
	travis@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, rjw@...k.pl,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c - bisected

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:22:20 +0200
>>
>> > And i guess the next generation of 4K CPUs support should just get away
>> > from cpumask_t-on-kernel-stack model altogether, as the current model is
>> > not maintainable. We tried the on-kernel-stack variant, and it really
>> > does not work reliably. We can fix this in v2.6.28.
>>
>> I recenetly did some work on sparc64 to use cpumask pointers as much
>> as possible.
>>
>> The only case that didn't work was due to a limitation in arch
>> interfaces for the new generic smp_call_function() code. It passes a
>> cpumask_t instead of a pointer to one via
>> arch_send_call_function_ipi().
>>
>> But other than that, the whole sparc64 SMP stuff uses cpumask_t
>> pointers only.

wonder if could use "unsigned long *" directly.
so could dyn_array directly like

int cpumask_size;

unsigned long *online_cpu_map;
DEFINE_DYN_ARRAY(online_cpu_map, sizeof(unsigned long), cpumask_size,
PAGE_SIZE, NULL);

and after nr_cpu_ids is assigned, have
cpumask_size = (nr_cpu_ids + sizeof(unsigned long) - 1)/sizeof(unsigned long);

then we could NR_CPUS=4096 kernel to small system. ...

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/