[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48B527F6.6040705@evidence.eu.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:09:58 +0200
From: Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
CC: lg@...x.de, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
marc.pignat@...s.ch
Subject: Re: [ARM] Regression ? at91rm9200 machine-type
Ben Dooks ha scritto:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:30:01PM +0200, Claudio Scordino wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a custom board equivalent to AT91RM9200DK.
>
> Is that exactly the same, or does it have changes?
No, it's really equivalent, that's why I used the same configuration.
>
> Note, this should have been sent to the linux-arm-kernel list, where
> it will be read by more of the developers who work on ARM, we don't
> all have time to sit on linux-kernel.
I see. I thought the right place for this kind of question was the
LKML. I will use linux-arm-kernel for future issues about Linux on ARM.
Anyway, eventually I found out that this is a bug of U-Boot (see
later) and not of Linux.
>
>> After commit
>>
>> 87fee013a23ad02821699aef5b76891b42959182
>>
>> [ARM] 4647/1: at91rm9200: Remove redundant machine-type verification
>> and manipulation
>>
>> I cannot boot my board anymore.
>
> Hmm, having looked at this, it would be very probably that your
> u-boot is not passing the right boot information to the kernel.
Right. U-Boot does not pass the right value when compiled for the
AT91RM9200DK board... I'm going to send an email to the U-Boot ML to
fix this bug.
Many thanks to all,
Claudio
--
Ing. Claudio Scordino
Software Engineer, PhD
Tel. +39-050-5492050
http://retis.sssup.it/~scordino/
Evidence Srl
Embedded Real-Time Solutions
http://www.evidence.eu.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists