[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48B53372.5060308@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:58:58 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@...il.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #11342] Linux 2.6.27-rc3: kernel BUG at mm/vmalloc.c - bisected
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>> 4kB used to be the _only_ choice. And no, there weren't even irq stacks.
>> So that 4kB was not just the whole kernel call-chain, it was also all the
>> irq nesting above it.
>
> I think your memory is failing you. In 2.4 and earlier, the kernel
> stack was 8kB minus the size of the task_struct, which sat at the
> start of the 8kB. For instance, from include/asm-i386/processor.h for
> 2.4.29:
but was shared with interrupts; so out of the 6Kb left, you had still really only 4Kb for user context stack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists