[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200808272336.05736.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:36:05 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export kmap_atomic_pfn for DRM-GEM.
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 05:43, Eric Anholt wrote:
> The driver would like to map IO space directly for copying data in when
> appropriate, to avoid CPU cache flushing for streaming writes.
> kmap_atomic_pfn lets us avoid IPIs associated with ioremap for this
> process.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c
> index 165c871..d52e91d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ void *kmap_atomic_pfn(unsigned long pfn, enum km_type
> type)
>
> return (void*) vaddr;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmap_atomic_pfn);
>
> struct page *kmap_atomic_to_page(void *ptr)
> {
I wonder if you ever tested my vmap rework patches with this issue? It
seems somewhat x86 specific and also not conceptually so clean to use
kmap_atomic_pfn for this. vmap may not be used by all architectures but
I think it might be able to cover some of them.
As I said, there are some other possible improvements that can be made
to my vmap rewrite if performance isn't good enough, but I simply have
not seen numbers...
Thanks,
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists