linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2][PATCH 4/9] Memory management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1219870576.8680.96.camel@nimitz>
Date:	Wed, 27 Aug 2008 13:56:16 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jeremy@...p.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2][PATCH 4/9] Memory management - dump state

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:48 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Dave Hansen (dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:34 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > (Or, is that too much effort required on your part to try and
> > > cherrypick bits of Oren's changes back into your tree?)
> > 
> > That would probably work as long as Oren is working on top of what I
> > have.  It's going to be a lot harder if I have to repeat the same
> > break-out process for each iteration of Oren's patches, though.
> > 
> 
> If Oren's purpose is not quite to create a upstreamable patchset,
> then it would make more sense for him to keep a git tree and
> put new patches on top of his existing ones (within reaason as he
> rebases).  Then you'd at least be able to trivially look at the latest
> deltas.

The trick would be compromising on things that I, for instance, think
need to be rewritten or removed.

Oren would have to rebase his work against what I do.  I guess you could
think about it like me being upstream from Oren.  Anything that I would
change, Oren would need to rebase on top of.

Oren, are you willing to keep a set of patches that add functionality on
top of a minimal set that I'm keeping?  Mine being the set that we're
trying to push into mainline as soon as possible.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/